If conscience always comes with a third of a second delay it means that experience is always based on the relationship with an already historicized moment.
A widespread idea is that a farmer’s intelligence is lower than that of a scientist, this belief is based on the assertion that the brain is not the same for everyone, and that the one received by each of us determines a destiny marked.
What if the group ratio do contemplate that individual irrationality is one of the tools to maintain overall balance?
If until now I only met people who were right not to trust me, today I would like to find one that is wrong to do so.
The neuroscientific science approach, bottom line, is a game of overlapping.
I have a hippopotamus sitting on my Heart, what is it? Mind or Brain?
Talking about a collective unconscious is the most elegant way of saying that an individual exists as being participatory without having to add the term “only”, and participating in something is the beginning necessary for the process of personal identification.